One of the lecturers in our
class discussed “Creative Writing in the Age of Computer”. In that meeting,
creative writing was defined as invariably an explicit product of one’s
autobiographical memory. The lecturer
said that creative writing was like weaving thread into which a very strong
twist must be determined. He also emphasized that it cracking the right words
in which one can express their story but make others relate. Also, he gave 5 necessary
things to be able to engage in creative writing: 1.) mastery of form, 2) great
emotional form, 3.) take the reader to a journey, 4.) groundbreaking, and 5.) x
factor. And as he was discussing these five things, he also inserted how
writing was like before. He told stories about typewriters and rewriting. This
made me realize how convenient it is now to write. One can simply backspace/delete
a misspelled word. Moreover, saving files and back-upping the stories would be
much easier. Truly, the age of the computer had made it easier for writers to create, edit and share their works.
In the middle of the
discussion, I started thinking why was creative writing discussed in a Science,
Technology and Society class. Then, I realized the main similarity between
science and creative writing. That was the root word of creative, create. In
both fields, its professionals would be encouraged to create something
innovative and something relatable to other people. Furthermore, in both
processes, imagination would be greatly needed. Scientists and writers would
both need to open up their minds and explore things that would help themselves
and inspire the society.
Blog By:
Gaea Isabel D. Trazo
201040563
Reference: Maeda, J. (2013, July 11). Artists and scientists: More alike than different. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/07/11/artists-and-scientists-more-alike-than-different/
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento